Before You Change the Organisation, Listen to the People Around It

There is a particular moment in organisational life when stakeholder research becomes especially valuable, and a heads-up: it is not when the new strategy has been written and someone decides it would be wise to “consult stakeholders”.

No, it needs to come much earlier.

Before the problem is fully defined and before the preferred solution has hardened. We need to listen before restructuring, service redesign, or a strategic shift becomes sufficiently developed that listening can no longer materially change it.

Because there is a significant difference between asking people what they think about a decision and allowing what they know to inform the decision itself.

Leaders know a great deal about their organisations

Senior leaders usually have access to enormous amounts of information. They know the finances, the operational constraints, the pressures facing staff, the board's concerns, the strategy, the regulatory environment and the difficult compromises that rarely appear in public documents. But proximity creates its own limitations.

When we work inside a system for long enough, certain assumptions become almost invisible. Language acquires shared meanings. Problems become framed in familiar ways, and this can lead to possibilities being dismissed before they are properly considered because everybody already knows why they “won't work”.

None of this implies poor leadership.

It is simply one characteristic of being inside a system.

People outside that system see something different.

A partner may understand where collaboration repeatedly becomes difficult; a funder may perceive ambiguity in the organisation's proposition. Service users may experience a process very differently from the team that designed it, and a community may recognise consequences that are barely visible from the boardroom.

Those perspectives are not automatically right either.

But together they contain knowledge the organisation cannot generate entirely from within itself.

And that is where stakeholder research becomes genuinely valuable.

A stakeholder map is not a stakeholder review

Most organisations can produce a stakeholder map. On it, they will have identified funders, partners, customers, beneficiaries, regulators, local communities, staff or other groups with an interest in the organisation.

And of course that is useful, but it only tells us who is there; it does not necessarily tell us what they are seeing.

A meaningful stakeholder review goes a lot further. It asks questions such as:

• Where do stakeholders think the organisation creates the greatest value?

• Where is there a gap between organisational intention and external experience?

• What do people believe is changing around the organisation?

• Which relationships are particularly important, fragile or underdeveloped?

• What assumptions does the organisation appear to be making from the outside?

• Where do different stakeholder groups see the same issue very differently?

• What are people reluctant to say directly to those who hold organisational power?

• What opportunities can stakeholders see that leadership may not yet recognise?

That kind of enquiry produces something very different from a list of stakeholders or a satisfaction score. It produces strategic intelligence.

Organisations that want to test their strategy increasingly recognise that stakeholder knowledge can be part of the evidence required to make better strategic decisions.

The most useful research happens before the answer is known

There is a risk with stakeholder engagement: sometimes an organisation has effectively already decided what it wants to do and then asks stakeholders to comment on it.

The process may still be valuable, and it may improve implementation or reveal risks.

But it is not the same as enquiry.

Research becomes much more powerful when there remains a genuine possibility that what is discovered will change the organisation's understanding of the problem, and that requires a degree of openness.

You may discover that stakeholders do not regard the issue you are trying to solve as the central issue at all.

You may find that a service considered peripheral internally is the thing people value most.

You may hear that different parts of the organisation are giving stakeholders contradictory messages.

You may discover considerable goodwill alongside frustration.

Or that stakeholders understand the organisation's future role rather differently from the organisation itself.

These are not inconvenient findings to be managed; they are information that can potentially transform your organisation.

And often it's exactly the information leadership needs before committing substantial resources to a particular direction.

When is independent stakeholder research particularly useful?

There are several moments when I think the case becomes especially strong.

Before a major strategy refresh, stakeholder research can help an organisation understand how its role, reputation and environment are changing before strategic priorities are fixed.

Before restructuring or significant organisational change, external relationships often depend upon structures and behaviours that are invisible on an organisation chart. Understanding those dependencies beforehand can expose unintended consequences.

When leadership suspects there is a gap between internal and external perception, most organisations have stories they tell about themselves. Independent research can explore whether the people around them experience those stories too.

When a decision depends upon lived experience, data can tell us a great deal about what is happening. Qualitative research can help explain how it is experienced, why it is happening and what people believe might need to change.

When the organisation is entering unfamiliar territory, new markets, partnerships, communities or areas of work introduce uncertainty. Listening before acting can prevent assumptions becoming expensive decisions.

And perhaps most importantly:

When people are unlikely to speak as freely to the organisation as they would to somebody independent of it. Independence can create a different quality of conversation.

Research is not a referendum

There is another distinction worth making.

Stakeholder research is not about asking stakeholders to run the organisation.

Boards and executives retain responsibility for strategy, resources, risk and difficult choices.

Nor does research mean that every stakeholder preference can or should be accommodated.

The purpose is not to transfer the decision; instead, it is to improve the quality of knowledge upon which the decision is made.

That is a much more useful way of thinking about participation.

An organisation can listen deeply and still make a decision some stakeholders disagree with.

But leadership should at least know what it is choosing between.

What good stakeholder research produces

The most valuable output is rarely a collection of quotations; actually, it's sense-making. Perhaps twenty, thirty or fifty conversations, and patterns begin to emerge. Good stakeholder research will tell us:

Where is there strong convergence?

Where are there significant differences?

Which concerns appear repeatedly?

What is only being said by one stakeholder group?

Where is there ambiguity?

What appears to be changing?

And what does all of this mean for the decision the organisation actually needs to make?

This is where qualitative research becomes strategic work. The researcher is not simply collecting voices. They analyse relationships between them, locate tensions, test assumptions, and make visible things that may have been difficult to see from inside the organisation.

Listening before exercising power

Perhaps this is ultimately why I think stakeholder research matters.

Organisational decisions redistribute things.

Money. Attention. Services. Roles. Relationships. Opportunity. Sometimes power itself.

The people affected by those decisions often hold knowledge about the system that those making the decision do not possess.

Listening does not remove the responsibility to lead.

It makes leadership better informed.

And there is a very different quality to asking people what they think after the future has been designed, and inviting their knowledge into the room while that future is still capable of changing. That is the moment when stakeholder research becomes more than consultation.

It becomes part of strategy.

She Changes undertakes independent qualitative and stakeholder research for organisations facing strategic decisions, change or uncertainty. Find out more about Commissioned Research.

Go to Research